The Weekly Challenge

HEADLINES

Welcome to the Week #289 of The Weekly Challenge.

Let us all welcome one more Perl hacker, Andre Ploger to Team PWC and thanks for the first contributions in Perl and Go. Even we had blog post too.

Thank you, Conor Hoekstra, for sharing solution in Python for the first time.

Paulo Custodio is on mission to get all the past challenges in Python. Please keep it coming.

Thanks, Dave Jacoby for the blog post after a long gap.

Hacktoberfest annual festival is back once again. I am planning to join the GitHub repositories: The Weekly Challenge and Perl Weekly Challenge Club like last year and allow all contributors to participate in the event..

Good Luck everyone and keep sharing.

Last 5 weeks mainstream contribution stats. Thank you Team PWC for your support and encouragements.


`Week`	`Perl`	`Raku`	`Blog`
`284`	68	23	17
`285`	61	23	18
`286`	59	25	20
`287`	52	25	28
`288`	44	18	17

Last 5 weeks guest contribution stats. Thank you each and every guest contributors for your time and efforts.


`Week`	`Guests`	`Contributions`	`Languages`
`284`	20	74	24
`285`	17	72	25
`286`	14	50	21
`287`	14	63	19
`288`	10	46	16

TOP 10 Guest Languages

Do you see your favourite language in the Top #10? If not then why not contribute regularly and make it to the top.

 1. Python     (2920)
 2. Rust       (756)
 3. Ruby       (730)
 4. Haskell    (709)
 5. Lua        (643)
 6. C          (585)
 7. C++        (549)
 8. JavaScript (491)
 9. Go         (412)
10. BQN        (374)

Blogs with Creative Title

1. Diving Deep: Recursive Solutions for Palindromes and Contiguous Blocks by Andre Ploger.

2. Contiguously Closest by Arne Sommer.

3. Return of the Son of This Looks Like A Job For Recursion! by Dave Jacoby.

4. Contiguous Palindromes by Jorg Sommrey.

5. not complete! by Luca Ferrari.

6. The Simple and the Fast by Matthias Muth.

7. A Man, A Plan, A Canal… PANAMA! by Packy Anderson.

8. Nearness and contiguity by Peter Campbell Smith.

9. Block the Palindrome by Roger Bell_West.

GitHub Repository Stats

1. Commits: 40,464 (`+106`)

2. Pull Requests: 10,909 (`+29`)

3. Contributors: 254 (`+1`)

4. Fork: 320

5. Stars: 175

With start of Week #268, we have a new sponsor Lance Wicks for the entire year 2024. Having said we are looking for more sponsors so that we can go back to weekly winner. If anyone interested please get in touch with us at perlweeklychallenge@yahoo.com. Thanks for your support in advance.

RECAP

Quick recap of The Weekly Challenge - 288 by Mohammad Sajid Anwar.

PERL REVIEW

If you missed any past reviews then please check out the collection.

RAKU REVIEW

If you missed any past reviews then please check out the collection.

CHART

Please take a look at the charts showing interesting data.

I would like to THANK every member of the team for their valuable suggestions. Please do share your experience with us.

NEW MEMBERS

Andre Ploger, an expert Perl hacker joined Team PWC.

Please find out How to contribute?, if you have any doubts.

Please try the excellent tool EZPWC created by respected member Saif Ahmed of Team PWC.

GUESTS

Please check out the guest contributions for the Week #288.

Please find past solutions by respected guests. Please share your creative solutions in other languages.

Task 1: Third Maximum

Submitted by: Mohammad Sajid Anwar

You are given an array of integers, @ints.

Write a script to find the third distinct maximum in the given array. If third maximum doesn’t exist then return the maximum number.

Example 1

Input: @ints = (5, 6, 4, 1)
Output: 4

The first distinct maximum is 6.
The second distinct maximum is 5.
The third distinct maximum is 4.

Example 2

Input: @ints = (4, 5)
Output: 5

In the given array, the third maximum doesn't exist therefore returns the maximum.

Example 3

Input: @ints =  (1, 2, 2, 3)
Output: 1

The first distinct maximum is 3.
The second distinct maximum is 2.
The third distinct maximum is 1.

Task 2: Jumbled Letters

Submitted by: Ryan Thompson

An Internet legend dating back to at least 2001 goes something like this:

Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn’t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

This supposed Cambridge research is unfortunately an urban legend. However, the effect has been studied. For example—and with a title that probably made the journal’s editor a little nervous—Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres: there is a cost by Rayner, White, et. al. looked at reading speed and comprehension of jumbled text.

Your task is to write a program that takes English text as its input and outputs a jumbled version as follows:

The first and last letter of every word must stay the same
The remaining letters in the word are scrambled in a random order (if that happens to be the original order, that is OK).
Whitespace, punctuation, and capitalization must stay the same
The order of words does not change, only the letters inside the word

So, for example, “Perl” could become “Prel”, or stay as “Perl,” but it could not become “Pelr” or “lreP”.

I don’t know if this effect has been studied in other languages besides English, but please consider sharing your results if you try!

Last date to submit the solution 23:59 (UK Time) Sunday 6th October 2024.